Binomials in English - Definition and Examples

Binomials in English s Definition In language studies, a pair of words (for example, loud and clear) conventionally linked by a conjunction (usually and) or a preposition. Also called a binomial pair. When the word order is fixed, the binomial is said to be irreversible. (See Examples and Observations below.) A similar construction involving three nouns or adjectives (bell, book, and candle; calm, cool, and collected) is called a trinomial. Also, see: ChunkCollocationDoubletsIdiomReduplicative Etymology From the Latin, two names Examples and Observations Examples of binomials in English include aches and pains, all or nothing, back and forth, beck and call, bigger and better, bit by bit, black and blue, black and white, blood and guts, bread and butter, bubble and squeak, cease and desist, checks and balances, cloak and dagger, cops and robbers, corned beef and cabbage, cut and dried, dead or alive, death and destruction, dollar for dollar, dos and donts, fair and square, fast and loose, fire and brimstone, fish and chips, flesh and bones, goods and services, ham and eggs, hand to mouth, hands and knees, heads or tails, hearts and flowers, hem and haw, high and dry, high and low, high and mighty, huff and puff, hugs and kisses, kiss and make up, knife and fork, leaps and bounds, life and death, little by little, long and short, lost and found, loud and clear, make or break, milk and honey, needle and thread, nickel and dime, nip and tuck, now or never, null and void, nuts and bolts, old and gray, one to one, open and shut, part and p arcel, peace and quiet, pins and needles, pots and pans, rags to riches, rise and fall, rise and shine, rough and ready, safe and sound, saints and sinners, short but sweet, show and tell, side by side, slip and slide, soap and water, song and dance, sooner or later, spic and span, sticks and stones, strange but true, sugar and spice, thick and thin, time after time, tit for tat, tooth and nail, toss and turn, ups and downs, wash and wear, and win or lose. Reversible and Irreversible Binomials In the typical newspaper headline Cold and snow grip the nation it is proper to set off the segment cold and snow as a binomial, if one agrees so to label the sequence of two words pertaining to the same form-class, placed on an identical level of syntactic hierarchy, and ordinarily connected by some kind of lexical link. There is nothing unchangeable or formulaic about this particular binomial: Speakers are at liberty to invert the succession of its members (snow and cold . . .) and may with impunity replace either snow or cold by some semantically related word (say, wind or ice). However, in a binomial such as odds and ends the situation is different: The succession of its constituents has hardened to such an extent that an inversion of the two kernels*ends and oddswould be barely understandable to listeners caught by surprise. Odds and ends, then, represents the special case of an irreversible binomial.(Yakov Malkiel, Studies in Irreversible Binomials. Essays on Linguistic Themes. University of California Press, 1968) Synonymous and Echoic Binomials The third most frequent binomial in the DoD [Department of Defense] corpus is friends and allies, with 67 instances. Unlike the majority of binomials, it is reversible: allies and friends also occurs, with 47 occurrences.Both allies and friends refer to countries which accord with US policies; as such, the two coordinates of the binomial may incline us to categorize the binomial as synonymous (Gustafsson, 1975). Rhetorically speaking, friends and allies may have an intensifying function, similar to echoic binomials (where WORD1 is identical to WORD2), such as more and more and stronger and stronger.(Andrea Mayr, Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. Continuum, 2008)

Tobbacco Smoking in Public Places essays

Tobbacco Smoking in Public Places essays Smokers are not only killing themselves, but are also contributing to the deaths of the population around them. If the smokers today, want to kill themselves then let them do it in a closed area. The non-smokers who choose to live a healthy life should not be punished. My argument is that smokers should be banned from doing their nasty and revolting habit in public. People make their livings farming and selling the deadly crop tobacco. My question for all the tobacco farmers out in the world today is: why not grow a crop like corn or something of that nature? If one is not able or does not have the knowledge to grow something beneficial, why not graze cattle or other livestock? There is simply no excuse for it. My Grandfather grew tobacco and even gave some to his brother to smoke out of his rusty old pipe. One afternoon, his brother died, the cause of his death was tobacco or also known as poison. After this incident, my Grandfather felt guilty about his brothers death. He stopped growing his cash crop tobacco, and started raising livestock. He tells me that story every time I visit him at his house. Tobacco farmers are not bad people. The majority of them are really good people, and just dont realize what they are doing to the world and people around them. The farmers are not to blame. The blaming should be credited to the consumers who buy the cigarettes and the cigarette companies, which produce them, but I do think that the farmers can change what they do with their fields. The main benefit of smoking in public is that the cigarette companies receive free advertisement. The public smoker influences the peers around them and obviously brings more consumers to buy cigarettes. When bringing in more consumers, the company expands leading to more jobs. The question is, whats more important: a few more jobs offered or more deaths resulting from cigarettes? ...