Napoleon Bonaparte: Good Or Bad Essay

short sleep Bonaparte was not a good draw and although he did admirer France he was as well as bloodthirsty and arrogant to be considered a good ruler. He did gain a great deal land and wealth for France however there was too much bloodshed involved. He said that he did not care how much blood was spil lead as long as he got his way and won he was fine with death. This shows that he has no precaution for the passel of France and would throw away their lives so that he could come out victorious. One cannot be considered a great leader unless he is a leader of the people and although the country may be pie-eyed that doesnt necessarily mean that the French people are happy.In addition Napoleon was withal very arrogant, a trait that eventu every(prenominal)y led to his downfall. His invasion of Russia was a mixture of his arrogance and greed that eventually lead to the death of almost all of his troops and his downfall. That downfall caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands o f men in the forces and also burned Russia to the ground and brought France plummeting downward. Altogether although Napoleon gave France wealth he would not be considered a great due to the amount of bloodshed under his reign.